Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Test Score Report & Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pattern

Our web-based practice exam software is an online version of the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate practice test. It is also quite useful for instances when you have internet access and spare time for study. To study and pass the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam on the first attempt, our web-based Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate practice test software is your best option. You will go through AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) mock exams and will see for yourself the difference in your preparation.

Our Data-Engineer-Associate exam training’ developers to stand in the perspective of candidate, fully consider their material basis and actual levels of knowledge, formulated a series of scientific and reasonable learning mode, meet the conditions for each user to tailor their learning materials. What's more, our Data-Engineer-Associate guide questions are cheap and cheap, and we buy more and deliver more. The more customers we buy, the bigger the discount will be. In order to make the user a better experience to the superiority of our Data-Engineer-Associate Actual Exam guide, we also provide considerate service, users have any questions related to our study materials, can get the help of our staff in a timely manner.

>> Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Test Score Report <<

Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pattern - Data-Engineer-Associate Exam

We know that every user has their favorite. Therefore, we have provided three versions of Data-Engineer-Associate practice guide: the PDF, the Software and the APP online. You can choose according to your actual situation. If you like to use computer to learn, you can use the Software and the APP online versions of the Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions. If you like to write your own experience while studying, you can choose the PDF version of the Data-Engineer-Associate study materials. Our PDF version can be printed and you can take notes as you like.

Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Sample Questions (Q85-Q90):

NEW QUESTION # 85
A company has used an Amazon Redshift table that is named Orders for 6 months. The company performs weekly updates and deletes on the table. The table has an interleaved sort key on a column that contains AWS Regions.
The company wants to reclaim disk space so that the company will not run out of storage space. The company also wants to analyze the sort key column.
Which Amazon Redshift command will meet these requirements?

A. VACUUM SORT ONLY Orders
B. VACUUM FULL Orders
C. VACUUM REINDEX Orders
D. VACUUM DELETE ONLY Orders

Answer: C

Explanation:
Amazon Redshift is a fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse service that enables fast and cost-effective analysis of large volumes of data. Amazon Redshift uses columnar storage, compression, and zone maps to optimize the storage and performance of data. However, over time, as data is inserted, updated, or deleted, the physical storage of data can become fragmented, resulting in wasted disk space and degraded query performance. To address this issue, Amazon Redshift provides the VACUUM command, which reclaims disk space and resorts rows in either a specified table or all tables in the current schema1.
The VACUUM command has four options: FULL, DELETE ONLY, SORT ONLY, and REINDEX. The option that best meets the requirements of the question is VACUUM REINDEX, which re-sorts the rows in a table that has an interleaved sort key and rewritesthe table to a new location on disk. An interleaved sort key is a type of sort key that gives equal weight to each column in the sort key, and stores the rows in a way that optimizes the performance of queries that filter by multiple columns in the sort key. However, as data is added or changed, the interleaved sort order can become skewed, resulting in suboptimal query performance. The VACUUM REINDEX option restores the optimal interleaved sort order and reclaims disk space by removing deleted rows. This option also analyzes the sort key column and updates the table statistics, which are used by the query optimizer to generate the most efficient query execution plan23.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
A: VACUUM FULL Orders. This option reclaims disk space by removing deleted rows and resorts the entire table. However, this option is not suitable for tables that have an interleaved sort key, as it does not restore the optimal interleaved sort order. Moreover, this option is the most resource-intensive and time-consuming, as it rewrites the entire table to a new location on disk.
B: VACUUM DELETE ONLY Orders. This option reclaims disk space by removing deleted rows, but does not resort the table. This option is not suitable for tables that have any sort key, as it does not improve the query performance by restoring the sort order. Moreover, this option does not analyze the sort key column and update the table statistics.
D: VACUUM SORT ONLY Orders. This option resorts the entire table, but does not reclaim disk space by removing deleted rows. This option is not suitable for tables that have an interleaved sort key, as it does not restore the optimal interleaved sort order. Moreover, this option does not analyze the sort key column and update the table statistics.
References:
1: Amazon Redshift VACUUM
2: Amazon Redshift Interleaved Sorting
3: Amazon Redshift ANALYZE

NEW QUESTION # 86
An airline company is collecting metrics about flight activities for analytics. The company is conducting a proof of concept (POC) test to show how analytics can provide insights that the company can use to increase on-time departures.
The POC test uses objects in Amazon S3 that contain the metrics in .csv format. The POC test uses Amazon Athena to query the data. The data is partitioned in the S3 bucket by date.
As the amount of data increases, the company wants to optimize the storage solution to improve query performance.
Which combination of solutions will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

A. Add a randomized string to the beginning of the keys in Amazon S3 to get more throughput across partitions.
B. Use an S3 bucket that is in the same AWS Region where the company runs Athena queries.
C. Preprocess the .csvdata to JSON format by fetchingonly the document keys that the query requires.
D. Use an S3 bucket that is in the same account that uses Athena to query the data.
E. Preprocess the .csv data to Apache Parquet format by fetching only the data blocks that are needed for predicates.

Answer: B,E

Explanation:
Using an S3 bucket that is in the same AWS Region where the company runs Athena queries can improve query performance by reducing data transfer latency and costs. Preprocessing the .csv data to Apache Parquet format can also improve query performance by enabling columnar storage, compression, and partitioning, which can reduce the amount of data scanned and fetched by the query. These solutions can optimize the storage solution for the POC test without requiring much effort or changes to the existing data pipeline. The other solutions are not optimal or relevant for this requirement. Adding a randomized string to the beginning of the keys in Amazon S3 can improve the throughput across partitions, but it can also make the data harder to query and manage. Using an S3 bucket that is in the same account that uses Athena to query the data does not have any significant impact on query performance, as long as the proper permissions are granted.
Preprocessing the .csv data to JSON format does not offer any benefits over the .csv format, as both are row-based and verbose formats that require more data scanning and fetching than columnar formats like Parquet. References:
Best Practices When Using Athena with AWS Glue
Optimizing Amazon S3 Performance
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

NEW QUESTION # 87
A data engineer runs Amazon Athena queries on data that is in an Amazon S3 bucket. The Athena queries use AWS Glue Data Catalog as a metadata table.
The data engineer notices that the Athena query plans are experiencing a performance bottleneck. The data engineer determines that the cause of the performance bottleneck is the large number of partitions that are in the S3 bucket. The data engineer must resolve the performance bottleneck and reduce Athena query planning time.
Which solutions will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

A. Create an AWS Glue partition index. Enable partition filtering.
B. Use Athena partition projection based on the S3 bucket prefix.
C. Transform the data that is in the S3 bucket to Apache Parquet format.
D. Bucketthe data based on a column thatthe data have in common in a WHERE clause of the user query
E. Use the Amazon EMR S3DistCP utility to combine smaller objects in the S3 bucket into larger objects.

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
The best solutions to resolve the performance bottleneck and reduce Athena query planning time are to create an AWS Glue partition index and enable partition filtering, and to use Athena partition projection based on the S3 bucket prefix.
AWS Glue partition indexes are a feature that allows you to speed up query processing of highly partitioned tables cataloged in AWS Glue Data Catalog. Partition indexes are available for queries in Amazon EMR, Amazon Redshift Spectrum, and AWS Glue ETL jobs. Partition indexes are sublists of partition keys defined in the table. When you create a partition index, you specify a list of partition keys that already exist on a given table. AWS Glue then creates an index for the specified keys and stores it in the Data Catalog. When you run a query that filters on the partition keys, AWS Glue uses the partition index to quickly identify the relevant partitions without scanning the entiretable metadata. This reduces the query planning time and improves the query performance1.
Athena partition projection is a feature that allows you to speed up query processing of highly partitioned tables and automate partition management. In partition projection, Athena calculates partition values and locations using the table properties that you configure directly on your table in AWS Glue. The table properties allow Athena to 'project', or determine, the necessary partition information instead of having to do a more time-consuming metadata lookup in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. Because in-memory operations are often faster than remote operations, partition projection can reduce the runtime of queries against highly partitioned tables. Partition projection also automates partition management because it removes the need to manually create partitions in Athena, AWS Glue, or your external Hive metastore2.
Option B is not the best solution, as bucketing the data based on a column that the data have in common in a WHERE clause of the user query would not reduce the query planning time. Bucketing is a technique that divides data into buckets based on a hash function applied to a column. Bucketing can improve the performance of join queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be shuffled between nodes. However, bucketing does not affect the partition metadata retrieval, which is the main cause of the performance bottleneck in this scenario3.
Option D is not the best solution, as transforming the data that is in the S3 bucket to Apache Parquet format would not reduce the query planning time. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance of analytical queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and providing efficient compression and encoding schemes. However, Parquet does not affect the partition metadata retrieval, which is the main cause of the performance bottleneck in this scenario4.
Option E is not the best solution, as using the Amazon EMR S3DistCP utility to combine smaller objects in the S3 bucket into larger objects would not reduce the query planning time. S3DistCP is a tool that can copy large amounts of data between Amazon S3 buckets or from HDFS to Amazon S3. S3DistCP can also aggregate smaller files into larger files to improve the performance of sequential access. However, S3DistCP does not affect the partition metadata retrieval, which is the main cause of the performance bottleneck in this scenario5. References:
Improve query performance using AWS Glue partition indexes
Partition projection with Amazon Athena
Bucketing vs Partitioning
Columnar Storage Formats
S3DistCp
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

NEW QUESTION # 88
A data engineer is using Amazon Athena to analyze sales data that is in Amazon S3. The data engineer writes a query to retrieve sales amounts for 2023 for several products from a table named sales_data. However, the query does not return results for all of the products that are in the sales_data table. The data engineer needs to troubleshoot the query to resolve the issue.
The data engineer's original query is as follows:
SELECT product_name, sum(sales_amount)
FROM sales_data
WHERE year = 2023
GROUP BY product_name
How should the data engineer modify the Athena query to meet these requirements?

A. Replace sum(sales amount) with count(*J for the aggregation.
B. Change WHERE year = 2023 to WHERE extractlyear FROM sales data) = 2023.
C. Add HAVING sumfsales amount) > 0 after the GROUP BY clause.
D. Remove the GROUP BY clause

Answer: B

Explanation:
The original query does not return results for all of the products because the year column in the sales_data table is not an integer, but a timestamp. Therefore, the WHERE clause does not filter the data correctly, and only returns the products that have a null value for the year column. To fix this, the data engineer should use the extract function to extract the year from the timestamp and compare it with 2023. This way, the querywill return the correct results for all of the products in the sales_data table. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant, as they do not address the root cause of the issue. Replacing sum with count does not change the filtering condition, adding HAVING clause does not affect the grouping logic, and removing the GROUP BY clause does not solve the problem of missing products. References:
Troubleshooting JSON queries - Amazon Athena (Section: JSON related errors) When I query a table in Amazon Athena, the TIMESTAMP result is empty (Section: Resolution) AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide (Chapter 7, page 197)

NEW QUESTION # 89
A data engineer uses Amazon Redshift to run resource-intensive analytics processes once every month. Every month, the data engineer creates a new Redshift provisioned cluster. The data engineer deletes the Redshift provisioned cluster after the analytics processes are complete every month. Before the data engineer deletes the cluster each month, the data engineer unloads backup data from the cluster to an Amazon S3 bucket.
The data engineer needs a solution to run the monthly analytics processes that does not require the data engineer to manage the infrastructure manually.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

A. Use Amazon Redshift Serverless to automatically process the analytics workload.
B. Use AWS CloudFormation templates to automatically process the analytics workload.
C. Use Amazon Step Functions to pause the Redshift cluster when the analytics processes are complete and to resume the cluster to run new processes every month.
D. Use the AWS CLI to automatically process the analytics workload.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Amazon Redshift Serverless is a new feature of Amazon Redshift that enables you to run SQL queries on data in Amazon S3 without provisioning or managing any clusters. You can use Amazon Redshift Serverless to automatically process the analytics workload, as it scales up and down the compute resources based on the query demand, and charges you only for the resources consumed. This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it does not require the data engineer to create, delete, pause, or resume any Redshift clusters, or to manage any infrastructure manually. You can use the Amazon Redshift Data API to run queries from the AWS CLI, AWS SDK, or AWS Lambda functions12.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
* A. Use Amazon Step Functions to pause the Redshift cluster when the analytics processes are complete and to resume the cluster to run new processes every month. This option is not recommended, as it would still require the data engineer to create and delete a new Redshift provisioned cluster every month, which can incur additional costs and time. Moreover, this option would require the data engineer to use Amazon Step Functions to orchestrate the workflow of pausing and resuming the cluster, which can add complexity and overhead.
* C. Use the AWS CLI to automatically process the analytics workload. This option is vague and does not specify how the AWS CLI is used to process the analytics workload. The AWS CLI can be used to run queries on data in Amazon S3 using Amazon Redshift Serverless, Amazon Athena, or Amazon EMR, but each of these services has different features and benefits. Moreover, this option does not address the requirement of not managing the infrastructure manually, as the data engineer may still need to provision and configure some resources, such as Amazon EMR clusters or Amazon Athena workgroups.
* D. Use AWS CloudFormation templates to automatically process the analytics workload. This option is also vague and does not specify how AWS CloudFormation templates are used to process the analytics workload. AWS CloudFormation is a service that lets you model and provision AWS resources using templates. You can use AWS CloudFormation templates to create and delete a Redshift provisioned cluster every month, or to create and configure other AWS resources, such as Amazon EMR, Amazon Athena, or Amazon Redshift Serverless. However, this option does not address the requirement of not managing the infrastructure manually, as the data engineer may still need to write and maintain the AWS CloudFormation templates, and to monitor the status and performance of the resources.
:
1: Amazon Redshift Serverless
2: Amazon Redshift Data API
3: Amazon Step Functions
4: AWS CLI
5: AWS CloudFormation

NEW QUESTION # 90
......

In fact, in real life, we often use performance of high and low to measure a person's level of high or low, when we choose to find a good job, there is important to get the Data-Engineer-Associate certification as you can. Our product is elaborately composed with major questions and answers. We are choosing the key from past materials to finish our Data-Engineer-Associate Guide question. It only takes you 20 hours to 30 hours to do the practice. After your effective practice, you can master the examination point from the Data-Engineer-Associate test question. Then, you will have enough confidence to pass it.

Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pattern: https://www.braindumpsvce.com/Data-Engineer-Associate_exam-dumps-torrent.html

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Test Score Report Prepay your exam (please follow the instructions) We will use our internal resources and connections to arrange your exam preparation materials for you (real exam questions) within 4 weeks from the day of your order, They are fully exposed to the problems faced by the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pattern certification candidates and thus have devised Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pattern study pack keeping in view the demands of the certification aspirants, Once download and installed on your PC, you can practice Data-Engineer-Associate test questions, review your questions & answers using two different options' practice exam' and 'virtual exam'.
Virtual Exam - test yourself with exam questions with a time limit.
Practice Exam - review exam questions one by one, see correct answers.

Next come some utility classes: Period, Instant, and Duration, Data-Engineer-Associate Martin Fowler is the Chief Scientist of ThoughtWorks, an enterprise-application development and delivery company.

Prepay your exam (please follow the instructions) We will use our internal Data-Engineer-Associate Test Score Report resources and connections to arrange your exam preparation materials for you (real exam questions) within 4 weeks from the day of your order.

Pass Guaranteed Updated Data-Engineer-Associate - AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Test Score Report

They are fully exposed to the problems faced by the Amazon certification Data-Engineer-Associate Real Dump candidates and thus have devised Amazon study pack keeping in view the demands of the certification aspirants.

Once download and installed on your PC, you can practice Data-Engineer-Associate Test Questions, review your questions & answers using two different options' practice exam' and 'virtual exam'.
Virtual Exam - test yourself with Data-Engineer-Associate Test Score Report exam questions with a time limit.
Practice Exam - review exam questions one by one, see correct answers.

Finally, please rest assured to purchase our Data-Engineer-Associate practice PDF downloads, Our AWS Certified Data Engineer valid torrent is useful in quality and favorable in price, it means they are proficient in content and affordable to get.

Will Allen Will Allen

Biography

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Test Score Report & Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pattern

Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Test Pattern - Data-Engineer-Associate Exam

Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Sample Questions (Q85-Q90):

Pass Guaranteed Updated Data-Engineer-Associate - AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Test Score Report

Quick Links